This is going to be short and sweet.
E-nough already.
Let’s resolve to stop using “reply-all” in e-mail. Every time I make that suggestion when I’m speaking to large audiences, I get applause. The first time I said it, it was just a wish of mine. Now, based on all the feedback I get, I sense is could make a significant difference in our work lives. And I get the feeling many agree.
How do you know on that rare occasion to use “reply-all?” When the people copied on the email must – absolutely, positively -- have the information to succeed, meaning to do the task at hand, to find the right location for the meeting, or to provide a mission-critical alert.
One of my wishes is fewer emails I don’t need. I feel compelled to read (or skim) key emails in my inbox so I don’t miss critical details. In many cases, we don’t need to follow each step of a key task, and the corresponding email; we need updates at key milestones.
Best use of email: Do you use “reply all” more often than you might need to?
- David Grossman
Other posts you might be interested in
View All Posts
Leadership Communication
2 min read |
September 8, 2021
Manager Communication: Don’t Just Pass Along an Email
Read More
Internal Communication
9 min read |
September 22, 2021
When to Use Email (and When Not to)
Read More
Internal Communication
2 min read |
October 10, 2022
Comments on this post